NEWS

news

Adani Gets Clean Chit, India-US Tariff Resolution Expected Soon The Indian financial markets experienced significant developments this week with three major announcements that could reshape investor sentiment and economic outlook. SEBI has cleared Adani Group of all Hindenburg allegations, India-US trade tensions may resolve within 8-10 weeks with tariffs potentially dropping from 50% to 10-15%, and market experts explain why portfolio performance doesn't always match Nifty movements. India-US trade negotiations symbolizing diplomatic cooperation SEBI Delivers Clean Chit to Adani Group in Hindenburg Case In a landmark decision that ends months of regulatory scrutiny, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has completely exonerated the Adani Group and Chairman Gautam Adani from all allegations made by US-based short-seller Hindenburg Research. The regulator's comprehensive investigation concluded that "no merit exists in allegations against the Adani Group" and that the questioned transactions were legitimate business dealings rather than fraudulent activities. The SEBI order specifically states that the controversial transactions did not qualify as "related party transactions" under the regulations that existed at the time. The regulator emphasized that the 2021 amendment to LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) regulations was substantive and could not be applied retroactively to past transactions. Key findings of SEBI's investigation include: No violation of Securities and Exchange Board regulations No evidence of manipulation, fraud, or unfair trade practices All loans were repaid with interest and no funds were siphoned off The questioned transactions were with unrelated parties and thus not covered under related party transaction definitions This clean chit represents a massive relief for Adani Group, which saw its market capitalization plummet by billions following Hindenburg's January 2023 report. Gautam Adani responded to the vindication by demanding a "national apology" from those who spread "false narratives". In his statement, he emphasized: "After an exhaustive investigation, SEBI has reaffirmed what we have always maintained, that the Hindenburg claims were baseless". Indian stock market recovery with digital trading displays The stock market impact has been immediately positive, with several Adani Group companies showing strong recovery patterns. Recent trading sessions have witnessed significant rebounds, with some stocks gaining up to 54% in just three days following positive developments. Adani Green Energy, Adani Energy Solutions, and Adani Total Gas have been leading the recovery charge. India-US Trade Deal Breakthrough: Tariffs Set to Drop Dramatically India's Chief Economic Adviser V. Anantha Nageswaran has expressed strong optimism about resolving the ongoing India-US tariff dispute within the next 8-10 weeks. The current punitive tariffs, which effectively doubled import duties to 50% on Indian goods, could be significantly reduced in what would mark a major diplomatic and economic breakthrough. Current tariff structure and proposed changes: Additional 25% penalty tariff imposed by the US in August 2025 is "likely to be withdrawn after November 30" Reciprocal 25% tariff could be reduced to 10-15% This would bring total tariffs down from 50% to approximately 10-15% - a massive reduction benefiting Indian exporters US Tariff Impact on Indian Export Sectors: MSME Share and Export Dependency Analysis The tariff resolution comes as both nations engage in intensive trade negotiations. A US delegation recently met with Indian counterparts in daylong discussions lasting approximately seven hours. The talks are part of broader efforts to restore the strategic partnership that has been strained by trade disputes. Impact on Indian exporters and economy: Most affected sectors that stand to benefit significantly from tariff reduction include: Textiles and garments: 25% of India's total exports to US, with 70% MSME participation Gems and jewelry: 25% share in US exports, dominated by Surat's diamond industry with 80% MSME involvement Seafood products: 25% export share with 75% MSME participation Chemicals: 40% MSME share in this sector The economic benefits of tariff resolution are substantial. India's exports to the US account for $87 billion annually (equivalent to 2.5% of India's GDP). Industry estimates suggest the current tariffs could cause a $4-5 billion drop in engineering exports alone and reduce overall GDP growth by 0.2-0.5%. However, the negotiation process involves compromises from India's side. The US is likely to demand substantial concessions, particularly in defense procurement and technology transfers. India has reportedly proposed reducing its tariff differential with the US to under 4% from the current 13% - one of the most significant trade barrier reductions in recent history. Why Your Portfolio Performance Differs from Nifty Index Movements A common frustration among investors is witnessing Nifty and Sensex reaching new highs while their individual portfolios remain stagnant or decline. This disconnect has become particularly pronounced in recent months as indices touch record levels while many stocks underperform. Understanding the Index-Portfolio Gap: The Nifty 50 represents only 50 companies - the largest and most established firms in India - while the broader market contains over 1,500 listed companies. Most individual portfolios contain a diverse mix of mid-cap, small-cap, and sector-specific stocks that don't mirror the Nifty's composition. Key reasons for performance differences: Index concentration: Nifty 50 is heavily weighted toward large-cap stocks like Reliance, TCS, and HDFC Bank Portfolio diversification: Individual investors typically hold mid-cap, small-cap, and sector-specific stocks with different performance patterns Sectoral rotation: While banking and IT (major Nifty components) perform well, other sectors may lag Market breadth: Broader indices often underperform the headline Nifty 50 during certain market phases September 2024 market performance data shows this clearly: Nifty 50 gained 2.3% in September Mid-cap and small-cap indices showed mixed performance with different sectoral trends Nifty Metal gained 7% while PSU Banks declined 2% Professional investment advice suggests that comparing your portfolio directly to Nifty is often meaningless unless your portfolio mirrors the index composition. For investors seeking Nifty-like returns, the recommendation is to invest in Index ETFs or Index Mutual Funds that replicate the Nifty 50 performance exactly. Market Outlook and Investment Implications The convergence of these three developments creates a uniquely positive environment for Indian markets. The Adani clean chit removes a major overhang that had been affecting investor sentiment across multiple sectors, while the potential US tariff resolution could unlock significant export opportunities. Key investment themes emerging: Infrastructure and Power: Adani Group companies in ports, power transmission, and renewable energy could see renewed institutional interest following SEBI's clearance. Export-Oriented Sectors: Textiles, gems and jewelry, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods companies could benefit substantially from reduced US tariffs. MSME-Focused Plays: Given that MSMEs comprise 70-80% of affected export sectors, companies and funds focused on this segment could outperform. The timeline for these developments suggests the next 2-3 months will be crucial for market direction. With tariff resolution expected by late November and Adani companies potentially regaining institutional investor confidence, the fourth quarter of FY25 could mark a significant turning point for Indian markets. Risk considerations remain around the actual implementation of tariff reductions and the terms of any India-US trade agreement. Additionally, global factors including US Federal Reserve policy and crude oil prices will continue influencing market performance regardless of these positive domestic developments.

NEWS

September 18, 2025

SEBI Grants Clean Chit to Adani Group in Hindenburg Saga

The Indian financial markets experienced significant developments this week with three major announcements that could reshape investor sentiment and economic…

NEWS

September 18, 2025

Kelly Brook’s Journey From Strictly Come Dancing to Marriage: The Truth Behind Her Cancelled Engagements

Kelly Brook, the English model and actress who captivated audiences on Strictly Come Dancing in 2007, has experienced one of the most…

The Communist Party of India (Maoist), commonly known as CPI (Maoist), represents one of the most persistent and complex insurgencies in contemporary India. This Marxist-Leninist-Maoist organization has been at the center of what former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh once described as the country's "biggest internal security challenge." As India approaches the government's self-imposed deadline of March 2026 to completely eradicate Maoist influence, understanding this organization's history, ideology, structure, and impact becomes crucial for comprehending modern India's security landscape. Map showing India's Red Corridor which highlights states affected by Maoist insurgency in dark red The CPI (Maoist) emerged from decades of revolutionary movements rooted in agrarian discontent and class struggle. Since its formation in 2004 through the merger of two major Maoist groups, the organization has challenged the Indian state across vast swathes of the country, particularly in the mineral-rich tribal belt known as the "Red Corridor." Despite significant government counter-insurgency efforts, the movement continues to operate across multiple states, adapting its strategies while maintaining its core objective of overthrowing the existing democratic structure through armed revolution. Historical Genesis and Evolution Roots in Peasant Uprisings The ideological foundations of CPI (Maoist) can be traced back to the Telangana Uprising (1946-1951), an armed peasant rebellion led by the Communist Party of India against feudal landlords and the princely state of Hyderabad. This uprising, along with the Tebhaga movement in Bengal (1946), established the precedent for communist-led agrarian struggles in India. However, both movements were eventually terminated following decisions by communist leadership in the USSR and India. The modern Maoist movement in India gained momentum with the 1967 Naxalbari uprising in West Bengal. On May 25, 1967, an armed peasant uprising led by Kanu Sanyal of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) erupted in Naxalbari village in Siliguri district. This 72-day rebellion, though crushed by police action, sparked a revolutionary movement that would eventually evolve into today's Maoist insurgency. Historical photo from the 1967 Naxalbari uprising, marking the beginning of the Naxalite movement in India Formation of CPI (Marxist-Leninist) and Subsequent Splits The Naxalbari movement led to the formation of the All India Coordination Committee of Communist Revolutionaries (AICCCR) in 1967, which later became the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) or CPI (ML) on April 22, 1969, under the leadership of Charu Mazumdar. The party adopted a strategy of armed struggle, rejecting parliamentary democracy in favor of revolutionary violence. However, the movement faced severe repression during the early 1970s. Operation Steeplechase, conducted jointly by the army and police from July 1 to August 15, 1971, resulted in the arrest of approximately 8,400 Naxalites, including top leadership. The death of Charu Mazumdar in police custody on July 28, 1972, led to the collapse of central authority and the fragmentation of the movement into numerous factions. The Path to Unification The 1980s witnessed the emergence of two major Maoist groups: the People's War Group (PWG) formed by Kondapalli Seetharamaiah in 1980, and the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC), which evolved from the earlier Dakshin Desh group. These organizations operated independently across different regions, with PWG primarily active in Andhra Pradesh and MCC concentrated in Bihar and Jharkhand. The 1990s marked a significant phase of reunification efforts. In September 1993, the MCC, PWG, and CPI (ML) Party Unity formed the All India People's Resistance Forum (AIPRF) to coordinate their activities. This collaboration eventually culminated in the historic merger of September 21, 2004, when the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War and the Maoist Communist Centre of India united to form the Communist Party of India (Maoist). Organizational Structure and Leadership Hierarchical Command Structure The CPI (Maoist) operates through a sophisticated hierarchical structure designed to maintain discipline while ensuring operational flexibility. At the apex sits the Party Congress, convened every five years, which serves as the highest decision-making body. Between congresses, the Central Committee (CC) consisting of 37 members functions as the supreme authority, with a 14-member Politburo (PB) handling day-to-day affairs. The organizational hierarchy descends through Special Area Committees, State Committees, Regional Committees, Zonal Committees, Area Committees, and finally to the basic unit—the Party Cell comprising three to five members. This structure ensures both centralized ideological control and decentralized operational capability across diverse geographical regions. Central Military Commission and Armed Wing A crucial component of the CPI (Maoist) structure is the Central Military Commission (CMC), responsible for military strategy and the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA). The CMC oversees several specialized departments including the Technical Research and Arms Manufacturing Unit (TRAM), Regional Commands, Special Action Teams, Military Intelligence, and the Tactical Counter Offensive Campaign. The PLGA, formed on December 2, 2000, represents the military arm of the organization with an estimated strength of 9,000-12,000 cadres. It operates through a three-tier structure: Main Force (companies and platoons), Secondary Force (guerrilla squads), and Base Force (people's militia and self-defense squads). In regions like Bastar, the people's militia alone is estimated to number 30,000 personnel. Leadership Evolution and Current Status Muppala Lakshmana Rao, alias Ganapathy, served as the General Secretary from 1992 until 2018, when he stepped down due to ill health and advancing age. His successor, Nambala Keshav Rao (alias Basavaraju), led the organization until his death in a security forces encounter on May 21, 2025. The current leadership structure remains largely secretive, though intelligence sources suggest that senior commanders from Andhra Pradesh or Telangana are likely to assume key positions. Ideological Framework and Strategic Vision Marxism-Leninism-Maoism as Guiding Ideology The CPI (Maoist) adheres to Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (MLM) as its ideological foundation, viewing it as the highest stage of communist thought. The organization's theoretical framework is based on Mao's Theory of Contradiction, which identifies four fundamental contradictions in Indian society: imperialism versus the Indian people, feudalism versus the broad masses, capital versus labor, and internal contradictions among ruling classes. According to CPI (Maoist) analysis, the contradiction between feudalism and the broad masses represents the principal contradiction requiring resolution through New Democratic Revolution (NDR). This theoretical framework justifies their strategy of armed struggle as the only viable path to social transformation. Strategic Objectives and Long-term Vision The organization's strategic vision encompasses both immediate and long-term objectives. Their Party Programme outlines several key goals: declaring India's 1947 independence as "fake," establishing political power through armed struggle, following the Chinese model of encircling cities from countryside, uniting with South Asian Maoist forces, supporting nationality struggles, and ultimately establishing a "People's Democratic Federal Republic of India". The CPI (Maoist) envisions their struggle progressing through three strategic stages: Strategic Defensive (current phase), Strategic Stalemate, and Strategic Offensive. In the current defensive phase, their immediate objectives include transforming guerrilla zones into liberated base areas and converting the PLGA into a full-fledged People's Liberation Army. Compact Revolutionary Zone Concept A central element of Maoist strategy involves creating a Compact Revolutionary Zone (CRZ) or "Red Corridor" extending from Pashupati (Nepal) to Tirupati (Andhra Pradesh). This ambitious plan aims to establish contiguous liberated territories across the mineral-rich tribal belt of central and eastern India, providing a secure base for expanding revolutionary activities nationwide. Current Operational Status and Geographical Presence The Shrinking Red Corridor The geographical extent of Maoist influence has undergone dramatic reduction in recent years due to sustained government counter-insurgency efforts. From a peak of 182 affected districts across 20 states in 2013, the number has steadily declined to just 38 districts in 2024, with projections indicating further reduction to 18 districts by 2025. Decline in Left Wing Extremism (LWE) affected districts in India from 2013 to 2025, showing the government's successful counter-insurgency efforts against CPI (Maoist) Currently, the CPI (Maoist) maintains significant presence in only six "most affected" districts: four in Chhattisgarh (Bijapur, Kanker, Narayanpur, and Sukma), one in Jharkhand (West Singhbhum), and one in Maharashtra (Gadchiroli). Additionally, six "districts of concern" require continued vigilance, spread across Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, and Telangana. Operational Capabilities and Tactics Despite territorial losses, the CPI (Maoist) continues to demonstrate sophisticated operational capabilities. The organization employs asymmetric warfare tactics including guerrilla attacks, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), abductions of government officials, and targeted assassinations of perceived "class enemies". Their strategy emphasizes mobility, local support, and exploitation of difficult terrain to evade security forces. The Maoists have developed expertise in manufacturing explosives using ammonium nitrate, often acquired through pilferage from mining operations. Intelligence reports indicate they have stockpiled significant quantities of weapons and explosive devices, including an estimated 6,000 rocket launchers. Their technical capabilities are enhanced by the Technical Research and Arms Manufacturing Unit, which focuses on indigenous weapons development. Government Response and Counter-Insurgency Strategy Evolution of Counter-Insurgency Approach The Indian government's response to the Maoist challenge has evolved from purely security-focused operations to a comprehensive strategy combining development initiatives with targeted military action. Initially, operations like the controversial Salwa Judum in Chhattisgarh (2005-2011) relied heavily on civilian militia, but these were disbanded by Supreme Court order due to human rights violations. The current approach, formalized under Operation SAMADHAN (launched in 2017), emphasizes a multi-pronged strategy encompassing security, development, infrastructure, public perception management, and coordination between various agencies. The government has set an ambitious target of completely eliminating Maoist influence by March 31, 2026. Recent Operational Successes Government forces have achieved significant tactical successes in recent years. In 2024 alone, 219 Maoist cadres were eliminated compared to just 22 in 2023 and 30 in 2022, marking a sharp escalation in counter-insurgency effectiveness. By March 2025, security forces had killed 90 Maoists, arrested 104, and facilitated the surrender of 164 others. The establishment of 280 new security camps since 2019, creation of 15 Joint Task Forces, and deployment of six additional CRPF battalions has significantly enhanced the government's operational capacity. These measures have been complemented by National Investigation Agency actions targeting Maoist financing networks and logistics support systems. Development and Infrastructure Initiatives Recognizing that security operations alone cannot address the root causes of insurgency, the government has substantially increased development spending in affected areas. Under the Special Central Assistance scheme, the most affected districts receive ₹30 crore annually while districts of concern receive ₹10 crore for infrastructure development. The "Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan" launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in October 2024 represents a comprehensive rural development initiative targeting over 15,000 villages and benefiting nearly 1.5 crore people in LWE-affected areas. The program focuses on improving connectivity (roads, mobile networks, and financial services) to integrate remote tribal areas into the mainstream economy. Human Rights Concerns and Civil Society Impact Violations by Both Sides The Maoist conflict has resulted in serious human rights violations by both insurgents and security forces, with civilian populations bearing the brunt of violence. According to government data, since 2001, Maoists have killed 5,811 civilians and 2,081 security personnel, with the overwhelming majority of civilian casualties being tribals whose cause the Maoists claim to champion. Maoist abuses include targeted killings, public executions through "people's courts," forced recruitment of children, sexual exploitation of women cadres, and coerced abortions. The organization's system of "levies" (extortion) and violent punishment of suspected informers has created a climate of fear in affected areas. Security forces have also committed significant violations, including arbitrary arrests, torture, extrajudicial killings, and collective punishment of villages suspected of Maoist sympathies. The now-disbanded Salwa Judum and Special Police Officers (SPOs) were particularly criticized for human rights abuses, leading to their prohibition by the Supreme Court in 2011. Impact on Civil Society and Development Civil society activists working in Maoist-affected areas face threats from both sides, with Maoists labeling them as police informers while security forces demand intelligence cooperation. This environment has severely constrained humanitarian work and development activities in affected regions. The insurgency has significantly hindered economic development in mineral-rich tribal areas, with Maoists targeting infrastructure projects, schools, and health centers as symbols of state authority. The disruption of governance structures and intimidation of local officials has created a vacuum that Maoists exploit to establish parallel administrative systems. International Context and Global Maoist Networks South Asian Connections The CPI (Maoist) has consistently pursued regional connections with other Maoist groups across South Asia. The organization's program explicitly calls for uniting with Maoist forces in the region to overthrow the Indian state. While concrete evidence of substantial material support remains limited, ideological exchanges and coordination with groups in Nepal and other countries have been documented. The organization's vision of revolution extends beyond national boundaries, viewing their struggle as part of a broader international communist movement. This perspective influences their strategic thinking and provides ideological justification for their activities within a global revolutionary framework. Learning from Global Insurgencies CPI (Maoist) strategy demonstrates adaptation of successful insurgency models from other countries, particularly drawing from Chinese communist revolution experiences and Vietnamese anti-colonial struggles. Their emphasis on protracted people's war, base area development, and gradual territorial expansion reflects classical Maoist strategic thinking adapted to Indian conditions. The organization has also studied more recent insurgencies, incorporating modern communication technologies, sophisticated explosive devices, and urban networks into their traditional rural guerrilla warfare approach. Future Prospects and Challenges Declining Influence and Structural Weaknesses Multiple factors indicate the CPI (Maoist) faces increasingly difficult circumstances. The dramatic reduction in affected districts, elimination of senior leadership, and improved security force capabilities suggest the movement's territorial control is contracting rapidly. The death of experienced leaders like Basavaraju has created leadership gaps that may be difficult to fill with equally capable successors. Ideological appeal appears to be waning, particularly among educated youth who historically formed an important recruitment base. Improved government development programs and better connectivity in tribal areas have reduced the organization's ability to exploit grievances and maintain local support. Persistent Challenges and Resilience Factors Despite setbacks, several factors suggest the Maoist challenge may persist beyond the government's 2026 deadline. The organization's decentralized structure, deep forest hideouts, and remaining sympathizer networks provide resilience against security operations. Persistent issues of tribal land rights, displacement due to mining projects, and inadequate development may continue providing recruitment opportunities. The CPI (Maoist) has demonstrated adaptive capacity throughout its history, surviving multiple leadership crises and security crackdowns. Their underground organizational structure and experience in clandestine operations suggest they may survive the current pressure and potentially resurge if conditions become favorable. Government Strategy Assessment The current government approach shows greater sophistication than previous purely security-focused strategies. The combination of targeted military operations, development spending, and infrastructure improvement addresses both immediate security threats and underlying socio-economic grievances. However, success requires sustained commitment across multiple administrations and continued coordination between central and state governments. The March 2026 deadline, while providing focus and urgency, may be overly optimistic given the complex nature of the challenge and historical resilience of the movement. Conclusion The Communist Party of India (Maoist) represents a unique phenomenon in contemporary insurgency movements—a Marxist-Leninist organization that has sustained armed struggle for over five decades while adapting to changing political, social, and security environments. From its origins in the 1967 Naxalbari uprising to its current incarnation as India's primary left-wing extremist group, the CPI (Maoist) has consistently challenged the Indian state's authority in some of its most marginalized regions. The organization's sophisticated ideological framework, hierarchical structure, and strategic vision demonstrate the complexity of addressing insurgency rooted in genuine socio-economic grievances. While recent government efforts have significantly reduced Maoist territorial control and operational capacity, complete elimination remains a formidable challenge requiring sustained multi-dimensional engagement. The conflict's resolution ultimately depends not merely on security operations but on addressing the underlying issues of tribal rights, economic development, and social justice that provide legitimacy to the Maoist narrative. As India approaches the government's self-imposed 2026 deadline, the success of counter-insurgency efforts will be measured not just by the absence of violence but by the integration of marginalized communities into the mainstream of Indian democracy and development. The CPI (Maoist) phenomenon serves as a reminder that in diverse democracies like India, ensuring inclusive development and responsive governance remains essential for maintaining internal stability and national unity. The organization's eventual fate will significantly influence India's security landscape and provide important lessons for addressing ideologically motivated insurgencies in other contexts worldwide.

NEWS

September 16, 2025

Rise and Fall of Communist Party of India (Maoist)

The Communist Party of India (Maoist), commonly known as CPI (Maoist), represents one of the most persistent and complex insurgencies…

NEWS

September 12, 2025

iPhone Air: Apple’s Revolutionary Ultra Thin Smartphone Redefines Mobile Innovation

Apple has once again pushed the boundaries of smartphone engineering with the introduction of the iPhone Air, the company’s thinnest iPhone…

One of the most publicized triggers for the Nepal protests 2025 was the government's sweeping ban on social media platforms. In November 2023, authorities mandated that companies register with the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology and set up local offices. Officials claimed this measure combated hate speech, misinformation, and cybercrimes. They issued multiple notices, but major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, Snapchat, and Twitter (now X) largely ignored them. Only a handful complied, including the Chinese-owned TikTok—the sole major app to register. Nepal's Supreme Court backed the government, allowing bans on non-compliant services. By August 28, 2025, an ultimatum demanded registration by September 3, or face prohibition. When deadlines passed without action, the axe fell: 26 platforms vanished from Nepali networks overnight. Suddenly, citizens lost access to tools for communication, entertainment, and activism. Protesters decried this as a blatant assault on freedom of expression. "The government wants to silence us like dictators," one young demonstrator shouted in viral footage that circulated before the ban. Indeed, social media had become a battleground for exposing scandals. Videos highlighted politicians' lavish lives against the backdrop of public suffering, amplifying calls for accountability. The ban didn't just restrict speech; it aimed to quash dissent, especially as #NepoKids trended, spotlighting nepotism. Yet, this wasn't the sole catalyst. While media headlines focused on the "Nepal social media ban 2025," deeper issues simmered. The restriction disrupted daily life, from family chats with overseas workers to tourism bookings. Nepal's economy relies heavily on visitors drawn by Everest treks and cultural sites—sectors promoted via Instagram and YouTube. Businesses reported immediate losses, fueling broader outrage. In a nation where digital connectivity bridges gaps, this move alienated an entire generation already on edge. Underlying Grievances: Corruption and Nepotism in Nepal's Politics At the core of the Gen Z revolution in Nepal lies rampant corruption, a cancer eroding trust in institutions. Nepal ranks poorly on global corruption indexes, with Transparency International scoring it low due to bribery, embezzlement, and favoritism. Since 2008, the same aging politicians—many in their 70s—dominate the scene, passing power like a family heirloom. KP Sharma Oli, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, and Sher Bahadur Deuba have each served multiple terms as prime minister, often through shaky coalitions. Accusations abound. Deuba faces charges of pocketing commissions from aircraft deals, while his wife, Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba, allegedly forged documents to resettle Nepalis as Bhutanese refugees in the U.S. Dahal stands accused of siphoning funds meant for former Maoist fighters, amassing billions illicitly. Oli himself navigates probes for illegally converting public land into commercial property, defying court orders. Other ex-leaders allegedly sold government assets to cronies. A post-2006 policy shields politicians from investigations into "policy decisions," granting de facto immunity. This loophole encourages abuse, as leaders exploit positions without fear. Nepotism exacerbates the rot. Ministers' children flaunt luxury—Gucci bags, foreign vacations, sports cars—while ordinary youth struggle. Social media amplified these contrasts: one viral post juxtaposed a politician's son in a Lamborghini with a farmer's child toiling in fields. The #NepoBaby trend exploded on TikTok post-ban, evading restrictions since the app remained operational. Posters during protests captured the irony: "Politicians' kids return with designer goods; common kids return in coffins." This referenced Nepalis dying in foreign wars for meager pay. Such visuals ignited fury, turning abstract grievances into personal outrages. For those googling "Nepal corruption scandals 2025," this revolt underscores how unchecked power breeds inequality, pushing a generation to the brink. The Unemployment Crisis: Nepal's Youth Forced into Desperate Choices Economic despair forms another pillar of the Nepal political crisis 2025. With a youth unemployment rate hovering at 20.82% in 2024—and likely worsening by 2025—one in five young adults lacks work. Job creation lags behind population growth, leaving graduates with degrees but no prospects. Agriculture, the backbone of the economy, offers low wages, while manufacturing and services stagnate due to poor infrastructure and investment. Desperation drives migration. Over 7 million Nepalis work abroad, remitting billions that prop up the GDP. But opportunities dwindle, pushing some to extreme risks. Shockingly, by February 2024, over 15,000 joined Russia's military amid the Ukraine war. Lured by $4,000 monthly salaries (about 500,000 Nepali rupees), they receive minimal training before frontline deployment. Hundreds have died, their bodies returned in coffins—a grim symbol of Nepal's failures. "Why risk death in a foreign war?" protesters asked. The answer: no alternatives at home. Politicians' indifference stings deeper when their offspring enjoy privileges. This disparity fueled the Gen Z protests Nepal, as youth demanded jobs, not platitudes. Tourism, contributing 7% to GDP, suffered from the social media ban, eliminating digital marketing channels. Hotels and guides reported 30-50% booking drops, amplifying economic woes. Global comparisons highlight Nepal's plight. While neighbors like India and China invest in youth skills, Nepal's education system falters, with high dropout rates and mismatched curricula. The revolt demands reforms: vocational training, startup incentives, and anti-corruption measures to attract investment. Without change, the brain drain will intensify, hollowing out the nation's future. The Protests Erupt: From Peaceful Marches to Nationwide Uprising On September 8, 2025, Kathmandu's streets pulsed with energy as thousands converged. Organized by NGO Hami Nepal, the crowd—mostly 20-25-year-olds in school or college uniforms—marched from Maitighar Mandala toward Parliament. They chanted for freedom, jobs, and an end to corruption, embodying the Gen Z uprising Nepal. Initially peaceful, the demonstration turned volatile when police intervened. Water cannons drenched marchers, tear gas clouded the air, and rubber bullets flew. Clashes ensued as some protesters breached Parliament grounds. Then, horror struck: officers fired live ammunition, killing at least 19, including a 12-year-old, and injuring over 400. News spread like wildfire, galvanizing more citizens. Protests swelled in Pokhara, Butwal, Bharatpur, and Damak. A 3:30 PM curfew failed to deter crowds; instead, it intensified resolve. Roads clogged with demonstrators waving signs against nepotism and bans. The government's authoritarian response—echoing tactics in other global uprisings—backfired, transforming local anger into a national movement. Social media, though banned, played a covert role. VPNs allowed leaks, and TikTok became a hub for #NepalProtests2025 content. Videos of police brutality went viral internationally, drawing condemnation from human rights groups. This escalation marked a turning point, as Gen Z leveraged digital savvy to outmaneuver restrictions. Government Response: Violence, Resignations, and Chaos Faced with mounting pressure, the government doubled down. Prime Minister Oli invoked nationalism, vowing not to yield to "arrogance" or threats to sovereignty—a classic deflection tactic. Yet, brutality only fueled flames. Protesters torched the prime minister's residence, Parliament, and even opposition homes. The finance minister fled streetside assaults, shoes raining down. Tragedy struck when the former prime minister's wife perished in a house fire. Amid chaos, the army deployed helicopters to evacuate officials. On September 9, Home Minister resigned "on moral grounds," and the social media ban lifted. But demands persisted: systemic reforms, not superficial fixes. By 2 PM that day, Oli resigned, capping a swift downfall. Protests continued, calling for accountability. Nepal's army chief urged calm, but tensions lingered. This sequence underscores how repressive measures accelerate collapse, a lesson for regimes worldwide. Aftermath and Global Reactions: Impacts of the Nepal Gen Z Revolution The Nepal protests 2025 left scars: deaths, injuries, and destroyed infrastructure. Economically, tourism halted, remittances dipped amid uncertainty. Politically, a power vacuum emerged, with interim talks underway. Gen Z's voice amplified, demanding youth inclusion in governance. Internationally, reactions varied. India, Nepal's neighbor, expressed concern over border stability. The UN condemned violence, urging dialogue. Human rights watchdogs like Amnesty International highlighted free speech violations. Social media giants, ironically, lobbied for reinstatement, exposing hypocrisy in global tech regulations. Comparisons to other Gen Z movements—Hong Kong's 2019 protests, Thailand's 2020 youth uprising—abound. These share themes: digital activism against authoritarianism. Nepal's revolt inspires, showing how connected youth can topple giants. Lessons from the Revolt: Pathways to a Stable Nepal This crisis teaches vital lessons. Governments must address root causes—corruption, unemployment—before they erupt. Ignoring youth invites backlash; engaging them builds resilience. Democracy thrives on transparency, not immunity for elites. Restoring monarchy, floated by some, risks regression. Instead, strengthen institutions: independent anti-corruption bodies, electoral reforms, economic diversification. Invest in education and jobs to retain talent. Singapore's model—from poverty to prosperity through meritocracy and innovation—offers inspiration. Nepal could emulate by prioritizing clean governance and youth empowerment. The Future Outlook: Hope Amid Uncertainty in Nepal As Nepal navigates post-revolt recovery, optimism flickers. Gen Z's energy could drive change, fostering inclusive policies. Tourism rebounds with digital freedom; anti-nepotism laws gain traction. Yet, challenges persist: healing divisions, rebuilding trust. For global observers, this underscores youth power in shaping nations. Searches for "Nepal future after protests 2025" reflect curiosity. Ultimately, Nepal's story reminds us: when voices unite, even mountains move. In conclusion, the Gen Z revolution in Nepal 2025 wasn't just a protest—it was a reckoning. By confronting corruption, inequality, and suppression, young Nepalis redefined their nation's trajectory. As the dust settles, the world watches, hoping for a peaceful, prosperous dawn.

NEWS

September 12, 2025

Why Young Nepalis Are Fed Up Right Now

One of the most publicized triggers for the Nepal protests 2025 was the government’s sweeping ban on social media platforms.1…

Indian Vice Presidential Election 2025: Results, Key Highlights, and Constitutional Insights India’s Vice President election 2025 was unlike any in recent memory. For the first time since 1987, an early poll was triggered after Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s resignation on health grounds, thrusting the nation into a closely-watched, high-stakes contest between NDA’s C. P. Radhakrishnan and INDIA bloc’s B. Sudershan Reddy. This article examines the unprecedented events, legal backdrop, voting process, result, candidate profiles, and the wider significance for Indian parliamentary democracy—all through the lens of a decade of election reporting experience. Why Was an Early Vice President Election Needed? Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned suddenly on July 21, 2025, citing health reasons in a letter to President Droupadi Murmu. His exit invoked Article 67(a) of the Constitution, which allows a Vice President to resign before the five-year tenure is complete by submitting a written resignation to the President. Dhankhar became only the third Vice President to resign mid-term after V. V. Giri and R. Venkataraman—both of whom quit to contest for the presidency, not due to health. Under Article 68, an election must be held as soon as possible to fill a vacancy caused by resignation, death, or removal of the Vice President—ensuring there’s little disruption in the functioning of Parliament. The last early election of this magnitude was nearly four decades ago, making 2025 a moment of historic precedence for Indian democracy. Vice President Year of Resignation Reason V. V. Giri 1969 Contested Presidential polls R. Venkataraman 1984 Contested Presidential polls Jagdeep Dhankhar 2025 Cited health reasons Election Schedule and Key Dates The Election Commission of India (ECI) issued its notification on August 1, 2025. The schedule was tight and transparent, in line with constitutional requirements: 1 Aug: Notification issued, nominations open 8 Aug: Last date for nominations 9 Aug: Scrutiny of papers 12 Aug: Withdrawal deadline 9 Sep: Polling and counting at new Parliament House, New Delhi Voting took place from 10 AM to 5 PM, followed by counting in the evening. The process was overseen by Pramod Chandra Mody, Secretary-General of Rajya Sabha, who acted as the Returning Officer. Electoral College & Voting System Explained The Vice President of India is elected by an Electoral College comprising both elected and nominated members of the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) and elected members of Lok Sabha (Lower House). Unlike Presidential polls, state assemblies are not involved: Elected Members of Rajya Sabha: 233 Nominated Members of Rajya Sabha: 12 Elected Members of Lok Sabha: 543 Total Electors: 788 MPs Voting uses a single transferable vote system through secret ballot. MPs are not bound by party whip—in theory, every vote is a personal choice, which occasionally leads to surprise cross-voting. To qualify, candidates must be Indian citizens aged over 35, meet Rajya Sabha eligibility criteria, and should not hold any office of profit under the government or its agencies. 2025 Vice Presidential Candidates & Profiles C. P. Radhakrishnan (NDA/BJP) Former Maharashtra Governor and BJP stalwart Hails from Tamil Nadu, known for his role in expanding BJP’s reach in south India Praised for grassroots connect and experience in legislative and administrative roles B. Sudershan Reddy (INDIA Alliance) Eminent former Supreme Court judge Backed by the INDIA bloc (Congress, TMC, DMK, and others) Recognized for landmark judgments in constitutional and civil rights cases, symbolizing the alliance’s focus on judicial independence and legal expertise Candidate Party/Alliance Background Highlights C. P. Radhakrishnan BJP/NDA Governor, 3-term MP, Tamil Nadu B. Sudershan Reddy INDIA bloc Retired Supreme Court judge Results & Voting Numbers CP Radhakrishnan secured a decisive win against B. Sudershan Reddy. Here’s the official result declared by the Returning Officer: CP Radhakrishnan (NDA): 452 votes B. Sudershan Reddy (INDIA): 300 votes Margin: 152 votes (the narrowest since the 2007 VP election) Votes cast: 767 (out of 788 MPs, turnout of 98.2%) Valid votes: 752 Invalid votes: 15 Candidate Votes Polled Percentage (approx) Outcome CP Radhakrishnan 452 58.8% Elected B. Sudershan Reddy 300 39.1% Defeated Invalid 15 1.9% Not Voted/Abstentions 21 2.7% Political Reactions & Statements The election outcome prompted strong responses from all quarters of politics: Prime Minister Narendra Modi lauded the “commitment to serve the marginalized” exemplified by Radhakrishnan, calling him “a leader from the grassroots” on his social media handles. Bihar CM Nitish Kumar expressed hope for “fairness and cooperation” in the Rajya Sabha. Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge emphasized that it was “more than just an election—a battle of ideology and Parliament’s future role for the opposition”. Constitutional and Parliamentary Significance A Vice President’s mid-term exit is rare. Article 67 provides for a five-year term but allows resignation or removal before tenure’s end. Article 68 mandates the ECI to conduct a poll quickly if a vacancy arises, ensuring seamless parliamentary functioning. The new Vice President will serve the remainder of the predecessor’s term, maintaining stability and continuity in legislative processes. Impact and What Lies Ahead Radhakrishnan’s victory, with a solid turnout and a narrow margin, underscores the NDA’s robust arithmetic in Parliament, but also signals that the INDIA bloc has become a more cohesive, competitive force. Expert opinion suggests the results could influence NDA and Opposition strategies in the lead-up to the 2029 general elections, especially as the Vice President plays a pivotal role as Rajya Sabha Chairperson—affecting the passage of key bills and debates. Expert Commentary: What This Means for 2029 NDA retains upper-house leverage but must bridge divides and foster consensus to govern effectively. The INDIA bloc’s close showing reveals revived opposition unity—portending a battleground for every Upper House seat in the years ahead. The Vice President’s integrity, fairness in chairing Rajya Sabha, and willingness to accommodate dissenting voices will shape perceptions of the alliance in power. Conclusion The 2025 Indian Vice President election stood out for its urgency, fierce contest, and clear electoral procedures under the Constitution. From Jagdeep Dhankhar’s early departure and the invocation of Article 67, to a tight voting margin and heightened political anticipation, this episode highlights how robust constitutional safeguards and mature parliamentary democracy keep India’s institutions vibrant and adaptable. For more details, download the free “VP Election 2025 Explained” PDF guide with a comprehensive analysis, candidate bios, and voting breakdown. FAQs Why was the 2025 Vice Presidential Election held early? The early election was needed because Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned on July 21, 2025, citing health reasons, triggering the constitutional provision for a prompt poll to fill the vacancy. Who were the candidates in the 2025 Vice President election? The main contenders were CP Radhakrishnan (NDA/BJP), a veteran leader and Governor, and B. Sudershan Reddy (INDIA bloc), a retired Supreme Court judge. What is the role of the Vice President in India? The Vice President serves as the ex-officio Chairperson of the Rajya Sabha and acts as President in case of a vacancy in that office, playing a crucial role in parliamentary proceedings and legislative balance. For a deep statistical breakdown, expert insights, and downloadable resources, don’t miss the “VP Election 2025 Explained” PDF—free for our readers!

NEWS

September 9, 2025

Indian Vice Presidential Election Results 2025

The year Indian Vice Presidential Election Results 2025 witnessed something unprecedented in Indian parliamentary democracy – the first early Vice…

Cart

NEWS

SEBI Grants Clean Chit to Adani Group in Hindenburg Saga

Kelly Brook’s Journey From Strictly Come Dancing to Marriage: The Truth Behind Her Cancelled Engagements

Rise and Fall of Communist Party of India (Maoist)

iPhone Air: Apple’s Revolutionary Ultra Thin Smartphone Redefines Mobile Innovation

Why Young Nepalis Are Fed Up Right Now

Indian Vice Presidential Election Results 2025