tgnns logo

NEWS

Home - NEWS

news

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, recently hinted at the possibility of renewed negotiations with the United States over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. His remarks, while setting strict boundaries for any such talks, reflect a cautious openness to diplomacy, echoing the sentiments during the 2015 nuclear deal negotiations. However, the complex geopolitical landscape and ongoing regional tensions make the prospect of successful negotiations uncertain. Khamenei's Strategic Openness to U.S. Negotiations Ayatollah Khamenei, known for his conservative stance, surprised many by suggesting that engaging with the U.S. could be permissible under certain circumstances. "There is no harm in interacting with the enemy in specific situations," Khamenei stated, according to a transcript on his official website. However, he was quick to warn Iran's civilian government, led by reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian, not to place their hopes in Washington, emphasizing the need for caution and vigilance. This approach mirrors Khamenei's stance during the 2015 nuclear deal negotiations, where Iran agreed to limit its nuclear activities in exchange for lifting economic sanctions. Despite this apparent willingness to engage, Khamenei's distrust of the U.S. remains evident, especially after the U.S. unilaterally withdrew from the deal in 2018 under then-President Donald Trump. Challenges Facing Potential Talks While Khamenei's comments open the door for dialogue, the path forward is fraught with challenges. The political environment in both Iran and the U.S. is volatile, with tensions in the Middle East exacerbated by the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. The U.S. is also approaching a presidential election, with Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Trump as the leading candidates, adding further uncertainty to the potential for future negotiations. President Pezeshkian, who ascended to power after a helicopter crash claimed the life of hard-line President Ebrahim Raisi, has shown a willingness to reengage with the West. His administration, particularly through his foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, who played a significant role in the 2015 deal, may push for renewed talks. However, with Khamenei holding ultimate authority, the extent to which Pezeshkian can navigate these negotiations remains unclear. U.S. Stance on Iran's Nuclear Program The U.S. government has maintained a firm stance on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The State Department reiterated that while diplomacy is viewed as the best path forward, Iran's recent actions, including its nuclear escalations and lack of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), have created significant barriers to progress. Iran's nuclear activities have advanced significantly since the collapse of the 2015 deal. The country is now enriching uranium to levels close to weapons-grade, and surveillance by the IAEA has been hindered. Iran has also barred some of the agency's most experienced inspectors, raising concerns about its intentions. Amid these developments, the U.S. has emphasized that any new negotiations must address these escalations and ensure robust oversight to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Regional and Global Implications The potential for renewed negotiations is also complicated by the broader regional and global context. The Israel-Hamas conflict has heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, with both countries engaging in a shadow war that has included missile and drone attacks. Iran's support for Hamas and other militant groups in the region further strains its relations with the U.S. and its allies. Additionally, the global landscape is shifting, with the war in Ukraine influencing European perspectives on security and the dynamics of international diplomacy. These factors contribute to the complexity of reviving the nuclear deal, as any new agreement would need to account for these changing circumstances. Conclusion: A Delicate Balance Ayatollah Khamenei's recent remarks suggest a potential opening for renewed negotiations with the U.S., but the path forward is uncertain and fraught with challenges. The Iranian leadership remains deeply suspicious of Washington, and any future talks will need to navigate a complex web of regional tensions, global conflicts, and domestic political pressures. President Pezeshkian's administration may seek to capitalize on this opening, but the ultimate success of any negotiations will depend on the willingness of both sides to compromise and address the critical issues at hand. As the U.S. presidential election looms and tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, the prospect of a new nuclear deal remains uncertain, with significant hurdles yet to be overcome. NEWS
  • August 28, 2024

Iran’s Supreme Leader Signals Potential for New U.S. Negotiations Amid Nuclear Tensions

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, recently hinted at the possibility of renewed negotiations with the United States over Iran’s…
Introduction The world of social media often turns mundane topics into fiery debates, and the latest to fall into this whirlpool is the "Brahmin Genes" controversy. This topic has ignited widespread discussion, reflecting India's deeply ingrained caste dynamics. The incident started with a seemingly innocent social media post and spiraled into a full-blown controversy, revealing much about the current social climate. Let's dive into the details of this controversy, exploring what it is, how it started, and why it has caused such a stir. The Origin of the Brahmin Genes Controversy The controversy began when Anuradha Tiwari, CEO of a content marketing company called Just Burst Out, shared a picture of herself sipping coconut water on social media. Accompanied by the caption "Brahmin Genes," along with a flexing muscle emoji, the post immediately caught the attention of social media users. The image, along with its caption, soon went viral, accumulating close to a million views and sparking a heated debate. The seemingly casual post was quickly met with polarized responses. On one hand, some users praised Tiwari, suggesting that she was facing discrimination because of her Brahmin identity. On the other hand, many accused her of promoting casteism, arguing that her post reflected a sense of superiority associated with her caste. Social Media's Reaction: A Divided Public Social media, with its tendency to amplify divisive topics, saw an explosion of opinions. The hashtag #BrahminGenes trended on Twitter, with thousands of tweets either supporting or condemning Tiwari's post. Critics argued that her post perpetuated caste-based discrimination, while supporters claimed she was simply expressing pride in her heritage. The debate quickly escalated, with users from both sides of the argument flooding the platform with their perspectives. Some users went as far as to question Tiwari's attire in the post, linking it to her caste identity. They asked whether her "Brahmin Genes" allowed her to wear certain types of clothing, turning a discussion about a social media post into a broader debate about caste and identity. This controversy also revived conversations about caste-based reservations in India, with Tiwari previously expressing her opposition to the reservation system. She had mentioned how, despite scoring high marks, she was unable to secure admission to a prestigious institution, which instead went to a classmate with lower scores due to reservation quotas. The Broader Implications of the Controversy The Brahmin Genes controversy is more than just a social media debate; it is a reflection of the larger issues surrounding caste in India. The discussion highlighted the ongoing struggle between those who feel that caste-based reservations are unfair and those who believe that these reservations are necessary to address historical injustices. Author Chetan Bhagat also weighed in on the controversy, pointing out that the constant focus on caste issues could fragment the Hindu vote bank, something the opposition might be keenly aware of. Bhagat's comments added another layer to the controversy, suggesting that caste issues could have significant political ramifications. The debate around Brahmin Genes even inspired others to share their own experiences, with some users posting pictures of themselves wearing the sacred thread, or "janeu," traditionally associated with Brahmins. This act of publicizing caste identity through social media further fueled the controversy, with discussions about the role of caste in contemporary society taking center stage. The Role of Humor and Misunderstanding Amidst the serious debates, humor also found its way into the controversy. A comedian added to the mix by questioning the feminine form of the word "jackal" in Hindi, adding a layer of absurdity to the situation. This moment of levity, however, did not detract from the serious undertones of the discussions that were taking place. As the controversy continued to unfold, it became evident that what began as a simple social media post had escalated into a national conversation about caste, identity, and the role of social media in shaping public discourse. Conclusion: The Impact of the Brahmin Genes Controversy The Brahmin Genes controversy serves as a reminder of the power of social media to influence and reflect societal issues. It brought to the forefront the complex and often contentious issues surrounding caste in India, demonstrating how a single post can ignite widespread debate and bring underlying tensions to the surface. In the end, the controversy is not just about a social media post; it is about the broader issues of caste, identity, and the role these factors play in modern Indian society. As discussions continue, it is clear that the Brahmin Genes controversy will remain a significant point of reference in the ongoing conversation about caste and social media's impact on public discourse NEWS
  • August 27, 2024

Brahmin Genes Controversy Explained

Introduction The world of social media often turns mundane topics into fiery debates, and the latest to fall into this…
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has announced a 12-hour bandh across West Bengal to protest against the recent police action during demonstrations and to demand the resignation of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. The bandh, scheduled from 6 AM to 6 PM, reflects the growing tension in the state following a series of violent clashes between protestors and the police. BJP's Call for Action: A Demand for Justice Sukanta Majumdar, the President of Bengal BJP, has made an emphatic call to the people of West Bengal, urging them to participate in the bandh. The BJP's protest is a response to the tragic incident involving the rape and murder of a 31-year-old doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital. Majumdar emphasized the severity of the situation, highlighting the need for immediate action to address the state's deteriorating public safety. The 'Nabanna Abhiyan': A Protest Turned Violent The situation escalated during the 'Nabanna Abhiyan' protest march, organized in response to the RG Kar incident. The march, which started from College Square in Kolkata, aimed to reach Nabanna, the state secretariat where the Chief Minister's office is located. However, the peaceful demonstration quickly turned violent when protestors clashed with the police at Santragachi in Howrah. The Kolkata Police, in an attempt to control the situation, used forceful measures, including lathi charges, water cannons, and tear gas, to disperse the crowds. The iconic Howrah Bridge became a battleground as the police blocked the march, preventing the protestors from advancing toward the state secretariat. Mamata Banerjee's Government Under Fire The heavy-handed police response has drawn sharp criticism from BJP leaders. Shehzad Poonawalla, a prominent BJP spokesperson, compared Mamata Banerjee's actions to those of a dictator, accusing her government of protecting criminals and silencing dissent. He pointed out that the state government has repeatedly failed to deliver justice, leading to widespread frustration among the public. Amit Malviya, head of BJP's IT Cell, also condemned the West Bengal government, accusing it of stifling the voices of students and citizens seeking justice for the RG Kar victim. Malviya criticized the police for placing large containers on roads to block the protestors, questioning whether Banerjee feared a peaceful movement to the extent that she would resort to such extreme measures. BJP's Demands: Resignation and President's Rule The BJP's demands are clear: they want Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to resign and have called for the imposition of President's rule in West Bengal. The party argues that Banerjee's administration is incapable of maintaining law and order, and her resignation is necessary to ensure a fair investigation into the RG Kar case. Suvendu Adhikari, another senior BJP leader, placed the blame for the violence squarely on Banerjee's shoulders, accusing her of fostering an environment where criminals are shielded from justice. The BJP has also demanded that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conduct a polygraph test on both Banerjee and Police Commissioner Vineet Goel, who initially claimed the victim had died by suicide—a statement that the BJP believes was an attempt to cover up the truth. The 'Nabanna Abhijan': A Movement Fueled by Outrage The 'Nabanna Abhijan' rally, which witnessed the participation of hundreds of youths, was organized by student platforms 'Chhatrasamaj' and 'Sangrami Joutha Mancha,' representing state government employees. The rallyists held Mamata Banerjee directly responsible for the RG Kar tragedy, arguing that her government's failure to ensure the safety and security of women led to the horrific incident. The rally commenced from two strategic locations—College Square in North Kolkata and Santragachi in Howrah—both converging with the singular goal of demanding justice and accountability. The protesters, mostly young students and professionals, voiced their anger and disillusionment with the state government, calling for a leadership change to restore public trust and safety. Conclusion: A State on the Brink The 12-hour Bengal bandh called by the BJP is more than just a protest; it is a reflection of the growing unrest and demand for change in West Bengal. The tragic incident at RG Kar Medical College has ignited a firestorm of criticism against the Mamata Banerjee-led government, with calls for her resignation growing louder. As the bandh approaches, the state's political landscape remains volatile, with both sides bracing for what could be a pivotal moment in West Bengal's future. The outcome of this bandh and the subsequent actions by both the state government and the BJP will likely shape the political narrative in the state for the foreseeable future. NEWS
  • August 27, 2024

BJP Bengal Bandh Tomorrow Demands CM Mamata Banerjee Resignation

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has announced a 12-hour bandh across West Bengal to protest against the recent police action…
Introduction The Y chromosome, a crucial determinant of male sex in humans and many mammals, is slowly vanishing. This alarming trend has led scientists to question whether humanity might face a future without males. The possibility of the Y chromosome disappearing within a few million years raises concerns about the survival of our species unless new sex-determining mechanisms evolve. However, recent studies on certain rodents offer a glimmer of hope. This article delves into the role of the Y chromosome, its decline, and the potential implications for the future of humanity. Understanding the Role of the Y Chromosome In humans, sex determination hinges on the presence of the Y chromosome. Females have two X chromosomes, while males possess one X and one Y chromosome. Despite its small size, with only about 55 genes compared to the X chromosome’s 900, the Y chromosome plays a critical role in triggering male development. The key gene responsible for this is the SRY (sex-determining region Y) gene. Around 12 weeks into pregnancy, the SRY gene activates a genetic pathway that leads to the formation of male reproductive organs. This activation triggers the SOX9 gene, which is essential for male development in vertebrates. Without the Y chromosome, the formation of male characteristics in embryos would not occur, making it indispensable for the continuation of our species. The Decline of the Y Chromosome While the Y chromosome is essential, it has been gradually degenerating over millions of years. Originally, the Y chromosome had as many genes as the X chromosome, but over time, it has lost most of its active genes. The X and Y chromosomes were once identical, but evolutionary changes have caused the Y chromosome to shrink significantly. Today, it retains only about 55 genes, a stark contrast to the 900 genes on the X chromosome. This reduction has sparked debate among scientists about the future of the Y chromosome. Some predict it will disappear entirely within the next 11 million years, while others believe it could persist indefinitely. The uncertainty surrounding the Y chromosome's fate has led to concerns about the long-term survival of humanity, given its crucial role in male sex determination. Rodents That Survived Without the Y Chromosome Despite the grim outlook, nature offers examples of species that have survived the loss of the Y chromosome. Two rodent lineages, the mole voles of Eastern Europe and the spiny rats of Japan, have already lost their Y chromosome and continue to thrive. In these species, males and females both have X chromosomes, but the Y chromosome and the SRY gene are absent. A research team led by Asato Kuroiwa from Hokkaido University studied the spiny rats and found that most of the Y chromosome's genes had been relocated to other chromosomes. However, the SRY gene, which is crucial for male sex determination, was missing. Instead, they discovered a small duplication near the SOX9 gene on chromosome 3 in males, which appears to substitute for the SRY gene. This adaptation suggests that spiny rats have evolved a new mechanism for male sex determination without the Y chromosome, offering a potential model for how other species, including humans, might adapt in the future. Implications for the Future of Humanity The potential disappearance of the human Y chromosome raises significant questions about the future of our species. Unlike some reptiles that can reproduce asexually, mammals, including humans, require sperm for reproduction, making the presence of males indispensable. If the Y chromosome were to vanish without a replacement mechanism evolving, it could lead to the extinction of humanity. However, the evolution of a new sex-determining gene, as seen in spiny rats, offers hope. This evolutionary adaptability could prevent human extinction, but it comes with risks. If different regions develop unique sex-determining systems, it could lead to the emergence of new human species, each with distinct sex chromosomes. This scenario raises the possibility that in millions of years, Earth might be home to several different human species, each isolated by their unique genetic makeup. How the Y Chromosome Determines Sex To better understand the stakes, it's important to delve into how the Y chromosome determines sex in humans. As mentioned earlier, the Y chromosome carries the SRY gene, which is responsible for initiating male development. This gene activates other genes that lead to the formation of the testes, which produce male hormones necessary for male characteristics. Without the Y chromosome, this process would not occur, making the existence of males—and by extension, human reproduction—reliant on the Y chromosome. The potential disappearance of this chromosome, therefore, poses a direct threat to the continuation of our species. The Future of the Y Chromosome and Humanity The possible extinction of the Y chromosome is not just a biological curiosity; it is a critical issue that could shape the future of humanity. While some lizards and snakes can reproduce without males through a process called parthenogenesis, humans and other mammals cannot. This means that without the Y chromosome, human reproduction as we know it would be impossible. However, the adaptability seen in rodents like the spiny rat provides a possible pathway for human survival. If a new sex-determining mechanism were to evolve, it could ensure the continuation of our species. But this evolution could also lead to a fragmented human race, with different populations developing distinct sex-determining systems and potentially becoming separate species over time. Conclusion The fate of the Y chromosome is a topic of intense scientific debate, with significant implications for the future of humanity. While the gradual loss of the Y chromosome raises concerns about male extinction, the adaptability seen in some rodents offers hope. The evolution of new sex-determining mechanisms could ensure human survival, though it might lead to the emergence of new human species. As we look to the future, understanding and preparing for the potential changes in our genetic makeup will be crucial for the long-term survival of our species. NEWS
  • August 27, 2024

Y Chromosome Might Disappear

Introduction The Y Chromosome Might Disappear, a crucial determinant of male sex in humans and many mammals, is slowly vanishing.…
Supreme Court Orders Regularization of Worker After 30 Years of Service: Addressing Discrimination Among Similarly Placed Employees In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India recently directed the regularization of a female worker who had served the Posts and Telegraph Department in Gujarat for over 30 years without being given permanent status. This decision underscores the principle of equality in employment, as it addressed clear discrimination between two similarly placed employees. Background: A Tale of Two Employees The case centers around a woman employed as a "Water Woman" (sweeper) by the Posts and Telegraph Department in Kutch Division, Bhuj, Gujarat, since February 1986. Despite her long tenure of more than 30 years, she was not regularized, even though another employee in a similar position, Smt. K.M. Vaghela, who joined six years later, was granted the benefits of regularization. The woman initially sought regularization after serving for 16 years, citing a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Daily Rated Casual Labour v. Union of India. However, her request was denied by the Department, leading her to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) for redress. The Struggle for Regularization The Central Administrative Tribunal initially directed the Department to consider the woman's case for conversion to a full-time position under a 1992 circular. This circular outlined a scheme for the regularization of part-time laborers, stating that part-time workers who worked five hours or more daily could be made full-time employees through duty readjustment. Despite these instructions, the Department rejected the appellant's plea, arguing that she was a part-time worker paid on a contingency basis and only worked four hours a day. Consequently, the appellant once again turned to the CAT, seeking absorption as a full-time employee under the aforementioned scheme. However, the CAT rejected her application, and the Gujarat High Court upheld this decision, leaving the appellant with no choice but to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's Examination of Discrimination The key issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Department had discriminated between two similarly placed employees—one who was regularized and the other who was not. On behalf of the appellant, it was argued that the Department had regularized the services of Smt. K.M. Vaghela, who joined the same office in 1991, while denying the same benefits to the appellant. The Department defended its actions by claiming that Smt. Vaghela's regularization resulted from a specific direction by the CAT, which did not apply to the appellant. However, upon reviewing the case, the Supreme Court found that the CAT had only instructed the Department to consider Smt. Vaghela's case for a full-time position, without mandating her regularization. The Court observed that the Department had independently decided to regularize Smt. Vaghela's services as a Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS), uninfluenced by the CAT's order. Court's Ruling: Upholding the Right to Equality The Supreme Court concluded that the appellant had indeed been discriminated against. The Court noted that the Department failed to provide any evidence showing that the nature of work or the hours worked by Smt. Vaghela differed from those of the appellant. Moreover, under the applicable circulars, any temporary employee who had worked continuously for more than 240 days in the preceding 12 months was entitled to regularization. The Court emphasized that the appellant had served the Department for over three decades under the same conditions as Smt. Vaghela. Given this, the denial of regularization to the appellant was a clear violation of her right to equality in employment. Conclusion: A Victory for Employee Rights In its final judgment, the Supreme Court ordered the Department to regularize the appellant's employment, effective from the same date as Smt. Vaghela's appointment as MTS. The Court also directed that all consequential benefits be extended to the appellant within three months of the order. This decision is a significant victory for employee rights, particularly for those in temporary or part-time positions who are often overlooked for regularization despite long years of service. It reaffirms the principle that similarly placed employees must be treated equally, and that any deviation from this principle amounts to discrimination. The case sets a precedent for similar cases, emphasizing that employers must uphold fairness and equality in their treatment of all employees, regardless of their employment status. The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a reminder that long-serving temporary workers deserve recognition and should be given the same opportunities as their peers who have been granted regular status. NEWS
  • August 27, 2024

Supreme Court Orders Regularization of Worker After 30 Years of Service

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India recently directed the regularization of a female worker who had served…
Telegram Under Scrutiny in India for Extortion and Gambling: Potential Ban Looms Telegram, one of the world's most popular messaging platforms, has recently found itself at the center of controversy in India. The app is under investigation by the Indian government due to its alleged involvement in criminal activities, including extortion and gambling. The scrutiny has raised concerns that Telegram could face a ban in India, following the arrest of its founder, Pavel Durov, in Paris earlier this month. Telegram’s Alleged Involvement in Criminal Activities Telegram has long been a subject of concern for authorities globally due to its encrypted messaging services, which, while offering privacy to users, have also been exploited for illicit purposes. In India, the government is currently investigating claims that the platform has been used to facilitate gambling and extortion. These allegations have put Telegram under the microscope of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C). According to a report by Moneycontrol, these government bodies are particularly interested in the peer-to-peer (P2P) communications that occur on Telegram, which they believe are being used to conduct illegal activities. The ongoing investigation could lead to severe consequences for the platform in India, including a potential ban. Why Telegram Is Facing Increased Scrutiny Now While Telegram has faced similar accusations in the past, the current investigation appears to have gained momentum due to a recent incident involving the UGC-NET exam. The exam paper was reportedly leaked and sold on Telegram for prices ranging between ₹5,000 to ₹10,000. This incident has added to the concerns surrounding Telegram's role in enabling criminal activities, prompting the Indian government to take a closer look. Furthermore, Telegram’s ability to host large groups—up to 200,000 members—makes it a prime candidate for the spread of illegal content. This capacity for mass communication has led to the app being blamed for the distribution of extremist material, misinformation, and even facilitating criminal enterprises like drug trafficking and money laundering. The Arrest of Pavel Durov and Its Implications Pavel Durov, the Russian-born co-founder and CEO of Telegram, was arrested in Paris earlier this month under a French warrant. The arrest was reportedly due to Telegram’s insufficient moderation practices, which have allowed the platform to be used for various illegal activities, including money laundering, drug trafficking, and the dissemination of child sexual abuse material. Durov’s arrest has sparked a global conversation about the responsibility of tech platforms in moderating content. Critics argue that Telegram’s lax moderation policies have made it a haven for illegal activities. However, Telegram has defended its practices, stating that its moderation is on par with industry standards and that it is continually improving. In a statement, Telegram insisted that Durov has "nothing to hide" and emphasized that the platform complies with European Union laws, including the Digital Services Act. The company also highlighted that it serves nearly a billion users worldwide, providing a vital communication service. The Future of Telegram in India The ongoing investigation in India, coupled with Durov's arrest, has raised the possibility of Telegram being banned in the country. India is one of Telegram’s largest markets, and a ban could significantly impact the platform’s user base and reputation. The Indian government has not yet made any official statements regarding a potential ban, but the situation remains tense. The outcome of the investigation will likely determine Telegram’s future in India. Broader Implications for Messaging Platforms Telegram’s situation highlights the broader challenges that messaging platforms face in balancing user privacy with the need to prevent criminal activities. Encrypted messaging services like Telegram offer a level of privacy that is appealing to users, but this same feature can be exploited by bad actors. The debate over how to regulate these platforms is ongoing, with some advocating for stronger moderation and cooperation with law enforcement, while others argue that such measures could infringe on users’ privacy and freedom of expression. Conclusion Telegram’s current predicament in India underscores the growing tension between technology companies and governments worldwide. As messaging platforms continue to play a significant role in global communication, they also face increasing pressure to prevent their services from being used for illegal activities. The outcome of the investigation in India could set a precedent for how other countries handle similar concerns, potentially leading to stricter regulations and oversight of encrypted messaging platforms. For now, the future of Telegram in India hangs in the balance, with the possibility of a ban looming large. As the investigation unfolds, it will be crucial to watch how both Telegram and the Indian government navigate this complex situation. NEWS
  • August 26, 2024

Telegram Ban in India Soon due to Extortion and Gambling

Telegram Ban in India due to Extortion and Gambling, one of the world’s most popular messaging platforms, has recently found…
Vijayawada Metro Rail Project Hyderabad Auto Rickshaw stunt in hitech city Pawan Kalyan Movies are for fun That is not life Pawan Kalyan Throw Away The Mike BRS MLA Prakash Goud Joins Congress