Unacademy, a prominent player in the edtech industry, Unacademy Teacher Removed 2023 has recently made headlines by parting ways with one of its educators, Karan Sangwan. The decision was prompted by Sangwan’s remarks encouraging students to cast their votes in favor of educated candidates rather than those lacking knowledge. Unacademy’s co-founder, Roman Saini, expressed that this action was necessitated due to a breach of the organization’s ‘Code of Conduct.’
Committed to Quality Education
At the core of Unacademy’s mission lies a steadfast commitment to delivering high-quality education. To uphold this commitment, the platform has instituted a rigorous ‘Code of Conduct’ for all its educators. The purpose behind this code is to ensure that learners have access to impartial and unbiased knowledge. Placing learners at the forefront, Unacademy emphasizes that the classroom environment should not be tainted with personal opinions or perspectives that could potentially mislead students. In light of the recent circumstances, the decision to terminate Karan Sangwan’s association with Unacademy was made as a result of his violation of this ‘Code of Conduct.’
Unacademy Teacher Removed 2023
In response to the situation, Karan Sangwan has announced his intention to elucidate the details surrounding the controversy on his YouTube channel, scheduled for August 19th. He stated, “Over the past few days, a video has been circulating widely, and as a consequence of this, my numerous students preparing for judicial services examinations are facing significant challenges. I, too, find myself dealing with the repercussions.”
The Controversial Video
The controversy stemmed from a video that gained significant traction, particularly on X (formerly Twitter). In this video, Karan Sangwan is heard advocating for the election of well-educated politicians. He appears to be discussing recent legislative proposals in the Lok Sabha presented by the BJP-led union government, which seek to replace archaic British-era laws such as the IPC, CrPC, and Indian Evidence Act.
Expressing his frustration, Sangwan laments that the extensive notes he had prepared on criminal laws have now become obsolete. He states, “I find myself unsure whether to laugh or cry, given that I’ve put in substantial effort to compile bare acts, caseloads, and comprehensive notes. This ordeal requires significant dedication from all of us. You, too, have responsibilities.”
He continues, “However, remember this one thing for the future. When you cast your vote, opt for a candidate who possesses a strong education background. This way, you can evade experiencing a similar ordeal. Understand the importance of electing someone who is educated and possesses a comprehensive understanding. Refrain from electing individuals who only possess the skill of renaming. Make your choice wisely.”
Although Sangwan refrains from naming specific individuals, numerous individuals on social media have drawn parallels between his remarks and recent statements made by AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal, targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Responses from AAP and Congress
In the wake of reports surrounding Karan Sangwan’s dismissal, Arvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), questioned whether encouraging the election of educated candidates is a punishable offense. Kejriwal expressed, “While I hold respect for those who lack literacy, it is imperative that public representatives possess the necessary education. We are in the era of science and technology, and illiteracy among public representatives hinders the progress of a modern 21st-century India.” These sentiments were shared by the Delhi Chief Minister on X.
Additionally, Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate weighed in on the matter, criticizing Unacademy and highlighting screenshots of Roman Saini’s past tweets that praised demonetization as a “surgical strike on corrupt individuals.” She also shared an image of Unacademy founder Gaurav Munjal alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Shrinate voiced her concerns, stating, “Individuals who succumb to pressure and intimidation are ill-suited to foster citizens who possess the courage to confront challenges and stand resilient in the face of adversity. It is disheartening to witness such feeble and spineless individuals overseeing an educational platform.”
Arvind Kejriwal Challenges Unacademy’s Decision to Terminate Tutor Over Voting Remark
Delhi’s Chief Minister, Arvind Kejriwal, has raised questions about the recent dismissal of a tutor from the ed-tech platform Unacademy. The tutor in question, Karan Sangwan, was let go after encouraging students to cast their votes for “educated candidates” during a lecture. The termination has sparked a debate about the role of personal opinions in education.
Unacademy’s Decision and Statement
Unacademy’s decision to terminate Karan Sangwan stemmed from his remarks made during a lecture. Although he did not mention any names, Sangwan urged students not to empower uneducated individuals and instead vote for educated representatives in upcoming elections. In response, Unacademy released a statement explaining that its policy prohibits educators from sharing personal opinions during classes, as such expressions could disrupt the learning environment.
Kejriwal’s Defense of Educated Representation
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal weighed in on the controversy, questioning the grounds for Sangwan’s termination. Kejriwal defended Sangwan’s right to encourage educated voting and expressed his belief that public representatives should possess the necessary education to lead effectively. Kejriwal took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his perspective, stating, “Is it a crime to appeal to educated individuals to vote? While I hold respect for the illiterate, it is essential that those in positions of public representation are not lacking in education. In this era of science and technology, the progress of a modern 21st-century India depends on representatives who are well-versed.”
Unacademy’s Response and Code of Conduct
In response to the debate, Unacademy co-founder Roman Saini defended the platform’s decision to terminate Sangwan’s employment. Saini highlighted that Sangwan’s actions were in violation of the company’s strict ‘Code of Conduct’ for educators. The code aims to ensure that learners receive unbiased and impartial knowledge, placing learners at the forefront of Unacademy’s mission. Saini emphasized that the classroom is not an appropriate space for sharing personal opinions or views, as these could potentially sway students in a certain direction.
Saini explained, “Our Code of Conduct is designed to uphold the integrity of our educational platform. We prioritize providing learners with unbiased information and maintaining a focused learning environment. Regrettably, in light of the current situation, we were left with no option but to part ways with Karan Sangwan, given his breach of our Code of Conduct.”
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding Karan Sangwan’s termination from Unacademy has ignited a discourse about the balance between personal opinions and education. While Arvind Kejriwal defends the right to advocate for educated representation, Unacademy emphasizes its commitment to providing learners with neutral and unbiased information. The incident underscores the challenges of maintaining an impartial learning environment in an era marked by diverse perspectives and opinions.
Unacademy’s decision to part ways with Karan Sangwan underscores the organization’s unwavering dedication to offering unbiased and high-quality education. The controversy serves as a reminder of the impact that educators’ opinions can have on learners and the importance of maintaining a neutral and focused learning environment.
