The Allahabad High Court recently ruled on a petition filed by Ayushi Patel, a candidate for the NEET 2024 exam. Patel alleged that her OMR sheet was torn, leading to discrepancies in her results. She claimed her score based on the answer key was 715, but the official result showed only 335 marks under a different application number. The case gained attention after a viral video and support from political figures.
Court’s Decision
Upon investigation, the National Testing Agency (NTA) presented the original, undamaged OMR sheet in court, refuting Patel’s claims. The court termed her submitted documents as forged and dismissed her petition. It allowed the NTA to pursue legal action against Patel for submitting false evidence.
Examination of Evidence
During proceedings, it became evident that Patel’s allegations were not substantiated by factual evidence. The court emphasized the importance of authenticity in such cases, highlighting the risks associated with presenting misleading claims.
Implications and Future Actions
With the court’s decision, the NTA is now empowered to take legal steps against Patel. This ruling underscores the significance of transparency and adherence to procedural norms in examination processes. It also serves as a cautionary tale against attempting to manipulate or misrepresent facts in legal proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What was Ayushi Patel’s allegation against the NTA?
Ayushi Patel claimed her NEET 2024 results were affected due to a torn OMR sheet, which she alleged was the result of mishandling by the NTA.
Q2: What was the court’s verdict on Ayushi Patel’s petition?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed Ayushi Patel’s petition after finding her submitted documents to be forged, allowing the NTA to pursue legal action against her.
Q3: Why did the case gain public attention?
The case gained public attention due to a viral video shared by Ayushi Patel and subsequent support from political figures, sparking discussions about fairness in examination processes.
