Constitution of AP Police Complaints Authority State Security Commission 10


The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in their Judgment in Prakash Singh & Ors, first read above, among others, issued a direction to constitute a State Security Commission in every State to ensure that the State Government does not exercise unwarranted influence or pressure on the State Police and for laying down the broad policy guidelines so that the State Police always acts according to the laws of the land and the Constitution of the Country, till
framing of appropriate legislation.

In pursuance thereof, Government have constituted the State Security Commission vide orders issued . The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 6-5-2013 observed that the composition of the State Security Commission so constituted and the functions ordered therein, are not confirming to the direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Prakash Singh’s case.

Government after careful examination of the matter and keeping in view the directions/orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, and in modification of the orders issued in GO , hereby order that the constitution of the State Security Commission shall be with the following composition.

1. Home Minister (Ex-officio Chairperson)
2. Leader of Opposition
3. Chief Secretary to Government
4. Director General of Police (Ex-officio Secretary)
5. Five independent members to be nominated by the Government.

The State Security Commission constituted in para 3 above, shall discharge functions that shall include laying down broad policies and giving directions for the performance of the preventive tasks and service oriented functions of the police, evaluation of the performance of the State Police and preparing a report on evaluation of the performance of the police to be placed before the State Legislature.

The Commission shall meet and make recommendations on issues touching upon the functions to be discharged. The recommendations of the Commission are binding on the Government.

Orders on the terms and conditions of appointment of independent members and allowance payable to them shall be issued separately.

The State Security Commission shall meet at least once in six months and follow such rules with regard to its meeting, quorum and transaction of business as may be decided by the Commission. The above orders shall be in force till framing of appropriate legislation.

Government after careful examination of the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, hereby by order for constitution of State and the District level Police Complaints Authorities with the following composition:

a) A State Police Complaints Authority shall consist of one retired High Court / Supreme Court Judge who shall act as Chairman of the Authority and he will be assisted by three other members.

b) District Police Complaints Authority shall consist of one retired District Judge who shall act as Chairman of the District Police Complaints Authority and he will be assisted by three other members.

The Authorities constituted in para 2 above, shall discharge the following functions:

a) State level Complaints Authority shall look into the complaints made against the officers of the rank of Superintendent of Police and above and shall take into cognizance of only allegations of serious misconduct by the police personnel, which would include incidents involving death, grievous hurt or rape in police custody.

b) The District Police Complaints Authority would apart from the above cases, shall also inquire into allegations of extortion, land / house grabbing or any incident involving serious abuse of authority, in respect of Police Officers of and up to the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police in the district.

The Chairman of the State Police Complaints Authority shall be selected by the State Government from a panel of (3) names of retired Judges of High Court / Supreme Court proposed by the Chief Justice of High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

The Chairman of the District Police Complaints Authority shall be selected by the State Government from a panel of (3) names of retired District Judges proposed by the Chief Justice or a Judge of High Court of Andhra Pradesh nominated by the Chief Justice.

The Members of the State Police Complaints Authority & District Police Complaints Authorities shall be selected by the State Government from the panel of names proposed by Andhra Pradesh State HRC/Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta/Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission. The members to be included in the panel shall be chosen from amongst retired civil servants, police officers, officers of any other department or from civil society.

The Chairman & members of the above authorities shall be treated as full time members and separate orders shall be issued fixing the terms and conditions of appointment and remuneration.

The Authorities can engage the services of retired investigators from the CID, Intelligence, Vigilance or any other organization on temporary / regular basis depending upon the volume of work for field inquiries.

The State & District level Police Complaint Authorities shall make specific recommendations for any action, departmental or criminal, after due enquiry with justification on the allegations leveled against the delinquent police officers to the concerned statutory/ competent authority. Such recommendations shall be binding on the concerned authority subject to the provisions of law. The above orders shall be in force till enactment of law by State Legislature.

Andhra pradesh Police Complaints Authority 2013

G.O.Ms.No. 189 G.O.Ms.No. 191  Dated: 8th August, 2013

1. Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, dated 22.09.2006  in
WP (Civil) No.310/96  reported in (2006) 8 SCC.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 thoughts on “Constitution of AP Police Complaints Authority State Security Commission

  • M sai reddy worked as excise food

    M sai reddy(begumpet below flyover he is don), Jatta vinod,Jatta Srinivas(uppal bajaj show room he is don), Tula vijay, T sunil kumar, vani(narayana guda), ravi, vijaya maduri, k raj gopal reddy, these people involved in giving security and recovery of telegraph money of koti hyderabad. They are making jaggu rowdies by getting death certificate(The rowdies are alive for doing crime)and recovered all money this all made in pulivendula(no clue is there for there recovery but given security all belong to ysr party) these people are harassing telegraph employees by sending email and false statements. They purchased many acres of lands in medipally, boud uppal with that recovered money. FIR is launched in telangana and all the states cbi department including andhra.

  • Mouallim Mohsin Bin Hussain Al Kathiri (Al Kasary)

    Sir, thanks for the information about the police complaint authority and the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 22.09.2006 in WP (Civil) No.310/96 reported in (2006) 8 SCC. it is useful for the general public the G.O.Ms.No. 189 G.O.Ms.No. 191 Dated: 8th August, 2013 since the bifurcation of states of ANDHRA PRADESH & TELANGANA what is the status of Telangana state whether any formation of PCA if please give the concerned G.O Ms No.
    Thanks for your kind information which was shared by you

  • Putta kanthi kiran

    Good morning,

    Respected Sir,

    I am p kanthi kiran(9010625315) FIR(4152013 rape case) Ref No(851). I have registered the case, Indian Army(who ever involved) is involving in the above mentioned case and doing human trafficking and not getting the good job making getting quarrels from whole nation, all the day they are shouting to induce hiv to me and doing trafficking and demanding my flat. Please fine them appropriate. I became sick with this against the human rights people.
    complaint grievance no: MODEF/E/2016/02333.
    I am native of hyderabad resident medipally.
    They are supporting the crime that is proved I am also telegraph customer koti.
    Please do the needful.

    regards,
    Putta kanthi kiran

    • Putta Kanthi Kiran

      I am P kanthi kiran(putta kanthi kiran) i am male citizen and married person, still facing the problem with the Maqbool Jani sub inspector and commander(vani) for unknown reasons. I am son in law of CBI(krk sai baba assistant director) and (Additional SP ashok kumar) I am unable to get the job because of this nuisance, they are restricting the organizations not to give me job.
      Please fine them if they are chasing the wrong person in me.

      regards,
      P Kanthi Kiran

      • putta kanthi kiran

        I am p kanthi kiran(putta kanthi kiran) i am male citizen and married person, still facing the problem will lot of people who ever involved in this case please arrest them or do encounter them. From independence we not received any gift.

        • putta kanthi kiran

          Hello good morning,
          Respected Sir,

          I am P kanthi kiran facing troubles because of your inefficiency, police are seeking for the substitutes for criminal.
          your state is marching towards Terrorism searching the substitutes for the money traffickers(jaggu leaders) and loving terrorist leaders. we have not performed any crime since 75 years i hope family should like us no crime. hopefully you do the best. medipatnam is the best in Terrorism.
          regards,
          kanthi

          • Putta kanthi kiran

            Respected Sir,

            I am Putta kanthi kiran i have been harassed by congress party without any reason. I am police background verified candidate. my life will be in danger because of these congress people who are mostly criminal and bring always loan from different nation to make the nation sick and they will give away the countries on there own.
            It became habit to do the business with blood and flesh for congress party leaders. The party is public party.
            I request the defense and police to take the necessary action
            regards,
            kanthi kiran

          • putta kanthi kiran

            putta kanthi kiran
            Hello good morning,
            Respected Sir,

            I am Putta kanthi kiran i have been harassed by congress party and army without any reason. I am police background verified candidate. my life will be in danger because of these congress people who are mostly criminal and man eater tribal community who brought 104 billions and more from world bank selling the country. because of These people only my mother and father(p hanumantha rao was railway employee) dead, these people spoiling my life. No one of my family member came from any sixth door they are harassing for the same. We are the family member of Great Pattabhi SitaRamayya. We are all government employees from 1930.

            regards,
            kanthi

  • karan

    Respected Sir,

    The shouting on people using bad words using remote statilites became habit in the hyderabad telangana, made by some people Madhusudan(9849361096) , vani, madhuri they are shouting at the people making them to induce hiv became common habit.
    they are searcing of the sai anna without his address and photo shouting at everyone. No one has booked nuisance case, past from five years.
    regard
    karan

  • Giridhar

    As per the orders of supreme court or high court. After the court orders still not completed 3 months ?. Is this contempt? Or not by govt of AP.